Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCallander, Isla
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-30T23:06:13Z
dc.date.available2018-09-30T23:06:13Z
dc.date.issued2017-10
dc.identifier.citationCallander , I 2017 , ' AB v HM Advocate: Rationalising Restrictions on the Use of the "Reasonable Belief" Defence ' Juridical Review , no. 3 , pp. 179-185 .en
dc.identifier.issn0022-6785
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 107638774
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 0adaf51f-45ab-46eb-85bf-e1c67e5e72a7
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2164/11199
dc.format.extent7en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJuridical Reviewen
dc.rightsThis is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication inJuridical Review following peer review. The definitive published version Callander, I 2017, 'AB v HM Advocate: Rationalising Restrictions on the Use of the "Reasonable Belief" Defence' Juridical Review, no. 3, pp. 179-185. is available online on Westlaw UK or from Thomson Reuters DocDel service .en
dc.subjectchild sex offencesen
dc.subjectdefencesen
dc.subjectreasonable beliefen
dc.subjectright to respect for private and family lifeen
dc.subjectScotlanden
dc.subjectcriminal lawen
dc.subjectK Lawen
dc.subject.lccKen
dc.titleAB v HM Advocate: Rationalising Restrictions on the Use of the "Reasonable Belief" Defenceen
dc.typeJournal itemen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Aberdeen, Lawen
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.date.embargoedUntil01-10-20


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record