Aberdeen University Research Archive >
6 - All research >
All research >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Incontinence-specific quality of life measures used in trials of treatments for female urinary incontinence: a systematic review.|
|Authors: ||Ross, S|
Glazener, Cathryn Margaret Anne
Hay-Smith, E. J. C.
|Keywords: ||Urinary Incontinence|
Quality of Life
|Issue Date: ||May-2006|
|Citation: ||Ross, S., Soroka, D., Karahalios, A., Glazener, C.M.A., Hay-Smith, E.J.C., and Drutz, H.P. (2006) Incontinence-specific quality of life measures used in trials of treatments for female urinary incontinence: a systematic review. International Urogynecology Journal, 17(3), pp. 272-85.|
|Abstract: ||This systematic review examined the use of incontinence-specific QOL measures in clinical trials of female incontinence treatments, and systematically evaluated their quality using a standard checklist.
Of 61 trials included in the review, 58 (95.1%) used an incontinence-specific QOL measure. The most commonly used were IIQ (19 papers), I-QoL (12 papers) and UDI (9 papers). Eleven papers (18.0%) used measures which were not referenced or were developed specifically for the study. The eight QOL measures identified had good clinical face validity and measurement properties.
We advise researchers to evaluate carefully the needs of their specific study, and select the QOL measure that is most appropriate in terms of validity, utility and relevance, and discourage the development of new measures. Until better evidence is available on the validity and comparability of measures, we recommend that researchers consider using IIQ or I-QOL with or without UDI in trials of incontinence treatments.|
|Appears in Collections:||Applied Health Sciences research|
Items in AURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.