AURA Takes you to the home page
 

Aberdeen University Research Archive >
6 - All research >
All research >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2164/167

This item has been viewed 426 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
CI+publication.pdf86.25 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Assessment of Pain in adults with cognitive impairment : a review of the tools
Authors: Schofield, Pat
Clarke, Amanda
Faulkner, Mark
Ryan, Tony
Dunham, Margaret
Howarth, Amanda
Keywords: assessment
older people
behavioural scales
assessment tools
pain
United Kingdom
Issue Date: Apr-2005
Publisher: Freund
Citation: Schofield, P., Clarke, A., Faulkner, M., Ryan, T., Dunham, M., and Howarth, A. (2005) Assessment of Pain in adults with cognitive impairment : a review of the tools. International journal on disability and human development.
Abstract: The aim of this paper is to discuss the results of a review into the literature related to chronic pain and the older adult. Several themes within the review have been identified and reported elsewhere and the final report has been published by the University of Sheffield in the form of an annotated bibliography. This report focuses upon the findings of the in relation to the assessment of pain in the adult with cognitive impairment. Issues surrounding assessment in the non-cognitively impaired older adult have also been reported elsewhere. For this paper nine studies will be discussed which report the development and testing of pain assessment scales the focus of which is upon behavioural indicators of pain. Some scales have been omitted from the review and the rationale for this decision will be discussed. Each of the selected scales will be discussed and the authors will make recommendations for both clinical practice and for future research based upon the validity, reliability and user friendliness of the scales. From the paper it can be concluded that the Abbey, DOLOPLUS-2 and PACSLAC appear to be the most reliable and valid and in terms of the “user friendliness” would be appropriate to explore further. Recommendations are made for further multi-centre evaluation of these scales.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2164/167
ISSN: 1565-012X
Appears in Collections:Applied Health Sciences research
All research

SFX Query

Items in AURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 


The University of Aberdeen
King's College
Aberdeen
AB24 3FX
Tel: +44 (0)1224-272000