AURA Takes you to the home page
 

Aberdeen University Research Archive >
6 - All research >
All research >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2164/189

This item has been viewed 5 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
2006_Surg_Hernia survey.pdf157.65 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: A United Kingdom survey of surgical technique and handling practice of inguinal canal structures during hernia surgery
Authors: Ravindran, Rajan
Bruce, Julie
Debnath, Debasish
Poobalan, Amudha
King, Peter M.
Issue Date: Apr-2006
Publisher: Mosby
Citation: Ravindran, R., Bruce, J., Debnath, D., Poobalan, A., and King, P.M. (2006). A United Kingdom survey of surgical technique and handling practice of inguinal canal structures during hernia surgery. Surgery [Online], 139(4). Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00396060 [Accessed 18 February 2008].
Abstract: Background: Recent trials have assessed the impact of elective nerve division on patient outcome after inguinal herniorrhaphy. The aim of this study was to establish UK surgical practice of handling of structures in the inguinal canal during herniorrhaphy. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of all Fellows (n = 1113) of the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (ASGBI) was performed. The main outcomes were to determine method of inguinal hernia repair and routine practice for intra-operative handling of structures in the inguinal canal. Results: A total of 852 (77%) questionnaires were returned, of which 784 (92%) surgeons performed inguinal herniorrhaphy. Approximately two-thirds (63%) of responding surgeons performed less than 50 procedures per annum and 37% conducted more than 50 procedures annually. Mesh was the preferred method used by 90% of surgeons; 6% used non-mesh, and 4% used other (laparoscopic) methods. Routine practice in relation to the inguinal structures varied by volume of hernia surgery; surgeons who conducted more than 50 procedures annually were more likely to visualize and preserve inguinal nerve structures. However, inconsistency in the answers suggested confusion over anatomy. Conclusion: This is the first UK survey to investigate method of hernia repair and usual handling practice of inguinal canal structures. There was wide acceptance of the use of mesh in inguinal hernia repair, with the majority of UK surgeons favoring an open approach. Surgeons performing high volumes of herniorrhaphy were more likely to preserve, rather than transect, inguinal nerve structures. This variation in practice may confound assessment of long-term neuralgia and other post-herniorrhaphy pain syndromes.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2164/189
ISSN: 0039-6060
Appears in Collections:Applied Health Sciences research
All research

SFX Query

Items in AURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 


The University of Aberdeen
King's College
Aberdeen
AB24 3FX
Tel: +44 (0)1224-272000