AURA Takes you to the home page

Aberdeen University Research Archive >
6 - All research >
All research >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Lourenco T 2007.pdf6.74 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer : safe and effective? - a systematic review
Authors: Lourenco, Tania
Murray, Alison Catherine
Grant, Adrian Maxwell
McKinley, Aileen Joyce
Krukowski, Zygmunt H.
Vale, Luke David
University of Aberdeen, School of Medicine & Dentistry, Division of Applied Health Sciences
Keywords: Colorectal Neoplasms
Systematic review
Issue Date: 2008
Publisher: Springer
Citation: Lourenco, T., Murray, A., Grant, A., McKinley, A., Krukowski, Z., and Vale, L. (2008) Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer : safe and effective? - a systematic review. Surgical Endoscopy [Online], 22(5), pp. 1146-1160. Available from: [Accessed 22 May 2008]
Abstract: Objective To determine the clinical effectiveness of laparoscopic and laparoscopically assisted surgery in comparison with open surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Background Open resection is the standard method for surgical removal of primary colorectal tumours. However, there is significant morbidity associated with this procedure. Laparoscopic resection (LR) is technically more difficult but may overcome problems associated with open resections (OR). Methods Systematic review and meta-analysis of short- and long-term data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LS with OR. Results Highly sensitive searches of nine databases identified 19 primary RCTs describing data from over 4,500 participants. Length of hospital stay is shorter, blood loss and pain are less, and return to usual activities is likely to be faster after LR than after OR, but duration of operation is longer. Lymph node retrieval, completeness of resection and quality of life do not appear to differ. No statistically significant differences were observed in rates of anastomotic leakage, abdominal wound breakdown, incisional hernia, wound and urinary tract infections, operative and 30-day mortality, and recurrences, nor in overall and disease-free survival up to three years. Conclusions LR is associated with a quicker recovery in terms of return to usual activities and length of hospital stay with no evidence of a difference in complications or long-term outcomes in comparison to OR, up to three years postoperatively.
ISSN: 1432-2218
Rights: The original publication is available at
Appears in Collections:Applied Health Sciences research
All research

SFX Query

Items in AURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


The University of Aberdeen
King's College
AB24 3FX
Tel: +44 (0)1224-272000