AURA Takes you to the home page
 

Aberdeen University Research Archive >
6 - All research >
All research >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2164/223

This item has been viewed 3 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Asante 2007 Evaluating the Economic Outcomes of the policy of fee exemption for maternal delivery care in ghana.pdf192.26 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Evaluating the economic outcomes of the policy of fee exemption for maternal delivery care in Ghana
Authors: Asante, F.A.
Chikwama, C.
Daniels, Aba
Armar-Klemesu, Margaret
Keywords: Fee Exemption Policy
Maternal Delivery Care
Catastrophic out-of-Pocket Payments
Out-of-Pocket Payments
Issue Date: Sep-2007
Publisher: Ghana Medical Association
Citation: Asante, F.A., Chikwama, C., Daniels, A., and Armar-Klemesu, M., (2007). Evaluating the economic outcomes of the policy of fee exemption for maternal delivery care in Ghana. Ghana Medical Journal, 41(3), pp. 110-117.
Abstract: Background: The Government of Ghana’s fee exemption policy for delivery care introduced in September 2003, aimed at reducing financial barriers to using maternal services. This policy also aimed to increase the rate of skilled attendance at delivery, reduce maternal and perinatal mortality rates and contribute to reducing poverty. Objective: To evaluate the economic outcomes of the policy on households in Ghana. Methods: Central and Volta regions were selected for the study. In each region, six districts were selected. A two stage sampling approach was used to identify women for a household cost survey. A sample of 1500 women in Volta region (made up of 750 women each before and after the exemption policy) and 750 women after the policy was introduced in Central region. Outcome Measures: Household out-of-pocket payment for maternal delivery and catastrophic out-of-pocket health payments. Results: There was a statistically significant decrease in the mean out-of-pocket payments for caesarean section (CS) and normal delivery at health facilities after the introduction of the policy. The percentage decrease was highest for CS at 28.40% followed by normal delivery at 25.80%. The incidence of catastrophic out-of-pocket payments also fell. At lower thresholds, the incidence of catastrophic delivery payment was concentrated more amongst the poor. For the poorest group (1st quintile) household out-of-pocket payments in excess of 2.5% of their pre-payment income dropped from 54.54% of the households to 46.38% after the exemption policy. The policy had a more positive impact on the extreme poor than the poor. The richest households (5th quintile) had a decline in out-of-pocket payments of 21.51% while the poor households (1st quintile) had a 13.18% decline. Conclusions: The policy was beneficial to users of the service. However, the rich benefited more than the poor. There is need for proper targeting to identify the poorest of the poor before policies are implemented to ensure maximum benefit by the target group.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2164/223
ISSN: 0855-0328
Appears in Collections:Applied Health Sciences research
All research

SFX Query

Items in AURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 


The University of Aberdeen
King's College
Aberdeen
AB24 3FX
Tel: +44 (0)1224-272000