AURA Takes you to the home page

Aberdeen University Research Archive >
6 - All research >
All research >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

This item has been viewed 4 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Harrington 2008.pdf74.56 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Health inequalities in England, Scotland and Wales : stakeholders' accounts and policy compared
Authors: Harrington, B.E.
Smith, K.E.
Hunter, D.J.
Marks, L
Blackman, T.J.
McKee, Lorna
Greene, A
Elliott, E
Williams, G.H.
University of Aberdeen, Business School, Management Studies
University of Aberdeen, School of Medicine & Dentistry, Division of Applied Health Sciences
Keywords: Health inequality
Health policy
Performance assessment
Issue Date: Jan-2009
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Harrington, B.E., Smith, K.E., Hunter, D.J., Marks, L., Blackman, T.J., McKee, L., Greene, A., Elliot, E., and Williams, G.H. (2009). Health inequalities in England, Scotland and Wales : stakeholders' accounts and policy compared. Public Health, 123(1), pp. e24-e28.
Abstract: Objectives The election of a Labour government in 1997 brought the issue of health inequalities firmly back on to the policy agenda across the UK. Since then, in the wake of devolution, the need to tackle health inequalities has been highlighted as a policy priority in all three mainland UK countries, albeit with varying degrees of emphasis. This paper reports on a major cross-national study, funded by the Economic and Social Research Council, investigating how National Health Service bodies, local councils and partnerships make sense of their work on health inequalities, and examining the difference made by the contrasting approaches that have been taken to performance assessment in England, Wales and Scotland. Study design Case studies, semi-structured interviews and analysis of key policy statements. Methods In order to explore how health inequalities have been approached by the three governments (noting that there was a change in governments in Wales and Scotland during this time), key policy statements published between May 1997 and May 2007 were analysed. Concurrently, data from stakeholder interviews carried out in 2006 in case study areas in each country were analysed to determine the extent of alignment between policy and practice at local level. Results This paper suggests that claims about the extent of health policy divergence in post-devolution Britain may have been exaggerated. It finds that, whilst the three countries have taken differing approaches to performance assessment and the setting of targets, policy approaches to health inequalities up until 2007 appear to have been remarkably similar. Furthermore, the first round of interview data suggest that variations in local understandings of, and responses to, health inequalities cannot always be clearly distinguished along national lines. Conclusions Based on the policy analysis, devolution in the UK does not appear to have resulted in substantively different national policy approaches to health inequalities. Indeed, the overall analysis suggests that (prior to the 2007 elections in Scotland and Wales) the differences between local areas within countries may be of as much interest as those between countries.
ISSN: 0033-3506
Appears in Collections:Applied Health Sciences research
All research

SFX Query

Items in AURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


The University of Aberdeen
King's College
AB24 3FX
Tel: +44 (0)1224-272000