AURA Takes you to the home page
 

Aberdeen University Research Archive >
6 - All research >
All research >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2164/293

This item has been viewed 4 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Fielding2009.pdf233.87 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Investigating the missing data mechanism in quality of life outcomes: a comparison of approaches
Authors: Fielding, Shona
Fayer, Peter M.
Ramsay, Craig R
Keywords: Data collection
Quality of life
Questionnaires
Issue Date: 22-Jun-2009
Publisher: BMC
Citation: Fielding, S., Fayer, P.M., and Ramsay, C.R., (2009) Investigating the missing data mechanism in quality of life outcomes: a comparison of approaches. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7 (57).
Abstract: Background: Missing data is classified as missing completely at random (MCAR), missing at random (MAR) or missing not at random (MNAR). Knowing the mechanism is useful in identifying the most appropriate analysis. The first aim was to compare different methods for identifying this missing data mechanism to determine if they gave consistent conclusions. Secondly, to investigate whether the reminder-response data can be utilised to help identify the missing data mechanism. Methods: Five clinical trial datasets that employed a reminder system at follow-up were used. Some quality of life questionnaires were initially missing, but later recovered through reminders. Four methods of determining the missing data mechanism were applied. Two response data scenarios were considered. Firstly, immediate data only; secondly, all observed responses (including reminder-response). Results: In three of five trials the hypothesis tests found evidence against the MCAR assumption. Logistic regression suggested MAR, but was able to use the reminder-collected data to highlight potential MNAR data in two trials. Conclusion: The four methods were consistent in determining the missingness mechanism. One hypothesis test was preferred as it is applicable with intermittent missingness. Some inconsistencies between the two data scenarios were found. Ignoring the reminder data could potentially give a distorted view of the missingness mechanism. Utilising reminder data allowed the possibility of MNAR to be considered.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2164/293
ISSN: 1477-7525
Appears in Collections:Applied Health Sciences research
All research

SFX Query

Items in AURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 


The University of Aberdeen
King's College
Aberdeen
AB24 3FX
Tel: +44 (0)1224-272000