AURA Takes you to the home page

Aberdeen University Research Archive >
6 - All research >
All research >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

This item has been viewed 3 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Ergina 2009.pdf192.29 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation
Authors: Ergina, Patrick L
Cook, Jonathan Alistair
Blazeby, Jane M
Clavein, Pierre-Alain
Reeves, Barnaby C
Seiler, Christoph M
Boutron, Isabelle
Keywords: Biomedical research
Surgical procedures, operative
Issue Date: 2009
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Ergina, P.L., Cook, J.A., Blazeby, J.M., Calvein, P., Reeves, B.C., Seiler, C.M., and Boutron, I., (2009) Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. Lancet, 374, pp.1097-1104.
Abstract: Research on surgical interventions is associated with several methodological and practical challenges of which few, if any, apply only to surgery. However, surgical evaluation is especially demanding because many of these challenges coincide. In this report, the second of three on surgical innovation and evaluation, we discuss obstacles related to the study design of randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies assessing surgical interventions. We also describe the issues related to the nature of surgical procedures—for example, their complexity, surgeon-related factors, and the range of outcomes. Although difficult, surgical evaluation is achievable and necessary. Solutions tailored to surgical research and a framework for generating evidence on which to base surgical practice are essential.
ISSN: 0140-6736
Appears in Collections:Applied Health Sciences research
All research

SFX Query

Items in AURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


The University of Aberdeen
King's College
AB24 3FX
Tel: +44 (0)1224-272000