AURA Takes you to the home page

Aberdeen University Research Archive >
6 - All research >
All research >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

This item has been viewed 1 times in the last year. View Statistics

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Mowatt G 2008.pdf330.09 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Screening tests for detecting open angle glaucoma : systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors: Mowatt, Graham
Burr, Jennifer Margaret
Cook, Jonathan Alistair
Siddiqui, M. A. Rehman
Ramsay, Craig R
Fraser, Cynthia Mary
Azuara-Blanco, Augusto
Deeks, Jonathan J
Keywords: Diagnostic techniques
Predictive value of tests
Sensitivity and specificity
Issue Date: 9-Jul-2008
Publisher: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
Citation: Mowatt, G., Burr, J.M., Cook, J.A., Siddiqui, M.A.R., Ramsay, C, Fraser, C., Azuara-Blanco, A., and Deeks, J.J., (2008) Screening tests for detecting open angle glaucoma : systematic review and meta-analysis. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 49, pp. 5373-85.
Abstract: PURPOSE. To assess the comparative accuracy of potential screening tests for open angle glaucoma (OAG). METHODS. Medline, Embase, Biosis (to November 2005), Science Citation Index (to December 2005), and The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2005) were searched. Studies assessing candidate screening tests for detecting OAG in persons older than 40 years that reported true and false positives and negatives were included. Meta-analysis was undertaken using the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model. RESULTS. Forty studies enrolling over 48,000 people reported nine tests. Most tests were reported by only a few studies. Frequency-doubling technology (FDT; C-20-1) was significantly more sensitive than ophthalmoscopy (30, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0–62) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT; 45, 95% CrI 17–68), whereas threshold standard automated perimetry (SAP) and Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph (HRT II) were both more sensitive than GAT (41, 95% CrI 14–64 and 39, 95% CrI 3–64, respectively). GAT was more specific than both FDT C-20-5 (19, 95% CrI 0-53) and threshold SAP (14, 95% CrI 1-37). Judging performance by diagnostic odds ratio, FDT, oculokinetic perimetry, and HRT II are promising tests. Ophthalmoscopy, SAP, retinal photography, and GAT had relatively poor performance as single tests. These findings are based on heterogeneous data of limited quality and as such are associated with considerable uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS. No test or group of tests was clearly superior for glaucoma screening. Further research is needed to evaluate the comparative accuracy of the most promising tests.
ISSN: 0146-0404
Appears in Collections:Applied Health Sciences research
All research

SFX Query

Items in AURA are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.


The University of Aberdeen
King's College
AB24 3FX
Tel: +44 (0)1224-272000