2 - Schools incorporating the Life Sciences and Medicine
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/2164/330
Browse
8 results
Search Results
Item Tablet versus paper marking in assessment : feedback matters(2016-04-30) Denison, Alan; Bate, Emily; Thompson, Jessica; University of Aberdeen.Medical Education; University of Aberdeen.Centre for Healthcare Education and Research Innovation (CHERI); University of Aberdeen.M&D Education AdministrationItem Effect of repetitive feedbackon residents' communication skills improvement(2014-07-01) Labaf, Ali; Jamali, Kazem; Jalili, Mohammad; Baradaran, Hamid R.; Eizadi, Parisa; University of Aberdeen.Other Applied Health SciencesItem Shared attention for action selection and action monitoring in goal-directed reaching(2020) Mahon, Aoife; Bendžiūtė, Solveiga; Hesse, Constanze; Hunt, Amelia R.; University of Aberdeen.Psychology; University of Aberdeen.PsychologyItem Paper versus electronic feedback in high stakes assessment(2018-12-31) Munro, A. J.; Cumming, K.; Cleland, J.; Denison, A. R.; Currie, G. P.; University of Aberdeen.Centre for Healthcare Education and Research Innovation (CHERI); University of Aberdeen.Medical EducationItem Application of theory to enhance audit and feedback interventions to increase the uptake of evidence-based transfusion practice : an intervention development protocol(2014-07-29) Gould, Natalie J; Lorencatto, Fabiana; Stanworth, Simon J; Michie, Susan; Prior, Maria E; Glidewell, Liz; Grimshaw, Jeremy M; Francis, Jill J; University of Aberdeen.Other Applied Health SciencesItem Assessing the strength of directed influences among neural signals : An approach to noisy data(2015-01-15) Sommerlade, Linda; Thiel, Marco; Mader, Malenka; Mader, Wolfgang; Timmer, Jens; Platt, Bettina; Schelter, Bjoern; University of Aberdeen.Physics; University of Aberdeen.Environment and Food Security; University of Aberdeen.Institute for Complex Systems and Mathematical Biology (ICSMB); University of Aberdeen.Medical SciencesItem Developing and Evaluating Communication Strategies to Support Informed Decisions and Practice Based on Evidence (DECIDE) : protocol and preliminary results(2013) Treweek, Shaun; Oxman, Andrew D; Alderson, Philip; Bossuyt, Patrick M; Brandt, Linn; Brożek, Jan; Davoli, Marina; Flottorp, Signe; Harbour, Robin; Hill, Suzanne; Liberati, Alessandro; Liira, Helena; Schünemann, Holger J; Rosenbaum, Sarah; Thornton, Judith; Vandvik, Per Olav; Alonso-Coello, Pablo; Loudon, Kirsty; DECIDE Consortium; University of Aberdeen.Other Applied Health Sciences; University of Aberdeen.Aberdeen Centre for Evaluation; University of Aberdeen.Institute of Applied Health SciencesItem Impact on maternity professionals of novel approaches to clinical audit feedback(Sage, 2007-03) Cameron, Martin; Penney, G.; MacLennan, Graeme Stewart; McCann, S.; Walker, AnneWe compared three approaches to feedback of clinical audit findings relating to miscarriage in 15 Scottish maternity services (printed report alone; report plus Action Planning Letter; report plus face-to-face Facilitated Action Planning). We surveyed clinicians to measure Theory of Planned Behaviour constructs (in the context of two audit criteria) before and after feedback (n=253) and assessed perceptions of the audit through in-depth interviews (n=17). Pre-feedback, clinicians had positive attitudes and strong subjective norms and intentions to comply, although perceived behavioural control was lower. Generally, positive attitudes, subjective norms and intentions increased after feedback but for one of the two criteria (providing a 7-day miscarriage service), perceived behavioural control decreased. No changes over time reached statistical significance and analysis of covariance (adjusting for pre-feedback scores) showed no consistent relationships between method of feedback and post-feedback construct scores. Interviews revealed positive perceptions of audit but frustration at lack of capacity to implement changes. While interventions which increased intensity of feedback proved feasible and acceptable to clinicians, we were unable to demonstrate that they increased intention to comply with audit criteria.