dc.contributor.author | Luzzi, Federico | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-07-25T23:04:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-07-25T23:04:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-09 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Luzzi , F 2016 , ' Testimonial Injustice Without Credibility Deficit (or Excess) ' , Thought: A Journal of Philosophy , vol. 5 , no. 3 , pp. 203-211 . https://doi.org/10.1002/tht3.212 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 2161-2234 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE: 68111383 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE UUID: cc2b6e85-d264-4631-a2c8-9376d476e454 | |
dc.identifier.other | Scopus: 84994607778 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2164/10801 | |
dc.format.extent | 9 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Thought: A Journal of Philosophy | en |
dc.rights | This is the peer reviewed version of the following article:Luzzi, F. (2016), Testimonial Injustice Without Credibility Deficit (or Excess). Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, 5: 203–211., which has been published in final form at doi: 10.1002/tht3.212. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. | en |
dc.subject | testimonial injustice | en |
dc.subject | epistemic injustice | en |
dc.subject | Miranda Fricker | en |
dc.subject | mansplaining | en |
dc.subject | credibility deficit | en |
dc.subject | due credibility | en |
dc.subject | B Philosophy (General) | en |
dc.subject.lcc | B1 | en |
dc.title | Testimonial Injustice Without Credibility Deficit (or Excess) | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of Aberdeen.Philosophy | en |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
dc.description.version | Postprint | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1002/tht3.212 | |
dc.date.embargoedUntil | 2018-07-25 | |
dc.identifier.vol | 5 | en |
dc.identifier.iss | 3 | en |