Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLuzzi, Federico
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-25T23:04:34Z
dc.date.available2018-07-25T23:04:34Z
dc.date.issued2016-09
dc.identifier.citationLuzzi , F 2016 , ' Testimonial Injustice Without Credibility Deficit (or Excess) ' , Thought: A Journal of Philosophy , vol. 5 , no. 3 , pp. 203-211 . https://doi.org/10.1002/tht3.212en
dc.identifier.issn2161-2234
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 68111383
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: cc2b6e85-d264-4631-a2c8-9376d476e454
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 84994607778
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2164/10801
dc.format.extent9
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofThought: A Journal of Philosophyen
dc.rightsThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article:Luzzi, F. (2016), Testimonial Injustice Without Credibility Deficit (or Excess). Thought: A Journal of Philosophy, 5: 203–211., which has been published in final form at doi: 10.1002/tht3.212. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.en
dc.subjecttestimonial injusticeen
dc.subjectepistemic injusticeen
dc.subjectMiranda Frickeren
dc.subjectmansplainingen
dc.subjectcredibility deficiten
dc.subjectdue credibilityen
dc.subjectB Philosophy (General)en
dc.subject.lccB1en
dc.titleTestimonial Injustice Without Credibility Deficit (or Excess)en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Aberdeen.Philosophyen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Aberdeen.Philosophy (Research Theme)en
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/tht3.212
dc.date.embargoedUntil2018-07-25


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record