dc.contributor.author | Whale, Alexandra S | |
dc.contributor.author | Huggett, Jim F | |
dc.contributor.author | Cowen, Simon | |
dc.contributor.author | Speirs, Valerie | |
dc.contributor.author | Shaw, Jacqui | |
dc.contributor.author | Ellison, Stephen | |
dc.contributor.author | Foy, Carole A | |
dc.contributor.author | Scott, Daniel J | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-04-19T10:40:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-04-19T10:40:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Whale , A S , Huggett , J F , Cowen , S , Speirs , V , Shaw , J , Ellison , S , Foy , C A & Scott , D J 2012 , ' Comparison of microfluidic digital PCR and conventional quantitative PCR for measuring copy number variation ' , Nucleic Acids Research , vol. 40 , no. 11 , e82 . https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks203 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0305-1048 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE: 129548485 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE UUID: 54cb79a9-1235-439d-b000-7fd74ab340d1 | |
dc.identifier.other | PubMed: 22373922 | |
dc.identifier.other | PubMedCentral: PMC3367212 | |
dc.identifier.other | Scopus: 84862205836 | |
dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0002-0602-4666/work/72631273 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2164/12186 | |
dc.description | ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to acknowledge Dr Malcolm Burns and Dr Alison Devonshire for critical review of the manuscript | en |
dc.format.extent | 9 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Nucleic Acids Research | en |
dc.rights | The Author(s) 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | en |
dc.subject | SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being | en |
dc.subject | Cell Line, Tumor | en |
dc.subject | DNA Copy Number Variations | en |
dc.subject | DNA, Neoplasm | en |
dc.subject | Female | en |
dc.subject | Gene Amplification | en |
dc.subject | Gene Dosage | en |
dc.subject | Genes, erbB-2 | en |
dc.subject | Humans | en |
dc.subject | Microfluidic Analytical Techniques | en |
dc.subject | Polymerase Chain Reaction | en |
dc.subject | Comparative Study | en |
dc.subject | Evaluation Studies | en |
dc.subject | Journal Article | en |
dc.subject | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | en |
dc.subject | R Medicine | en |
dc.subject.lcc | R | en |
dc.title | Comparison of microfluidic digital PCR and conventional quantitative PCR for measuring copy number variation | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of Aberdeen.Medical Sciences | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of Aberdeen.Institute of Medical Sciences | en |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
dc.description.version | Publisher PDF | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks203 | |
dc.identifier.vol | 40 | en |
dc.identifier.iss | 11 | en |