University of Aberdeen

AURA - Aberdeen University Research Archive

View Item 
  •   AURA Home
  • 5 - All research
  • All research
  • View Item
  •   AURA Home
  • 5 - All research
  • All research
  • View Item
  •   AURA Home
  • 5 - All research
  • All research
  • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      A cost-utility analysis of multivitamin and multimineral supplements in men and women aged 65 years and over

      View/Open
      Kilonzo 2007.pdf (299.2Kb)
      Publication date
      2007
      Author
      Kilonzo, Mary Mueni
      Vale, Luke David
      Cook, Jonathan Alistair
      Milne, Anne Catherine
      Stephen, Audrey Isabella
      Avenell, Alison
      MAVIS Trial Group
      Metadata
      Show full item record
      Abstract
      Background and Aims As people age there is a progressive dysregulation of the immune system that may lead to an increased risk of infections, which may precipitate hospital admission in people with chronic heart or respiratory diseases. Mineral and vitamin supplementation in older people could therefore influence infections in older people. However, the evidence from the available randomised controlled trials is mixed. The aim of the study was to assess the relative efficiency of multivitamin and multimineral supplementation compared with no supplementation. Methods Cost-utility analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial. Participants aged 65 years or over from six general practices in Grampian, Scotland were studied. They were randomised to one tablet daily of either a multivitamin and multimineral supplement or matching placebo. Exclusion criteria were: use of mineral, vitamin or fish oil supplements in the previous three months (one month for water soluble vitamins), vitamin B12 injection in the last three months. Results Nine hundred and ten participants were recruited (454 placebo and 456 supplementation). Use of health service resources and costs were similar between the two groups. The supplementation arm was more costly although this was not statistically significant (£15 per person, 95% CI -3.75 to 34.95). After adjusting for minimisation and baseline EQ-5D scores supplementation was associated with fewer QALYs per person (–0.018, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.002). It was highly unlikely that supplementation would be considered cost-effective. Conclusions The evidence from this study suggests that it is highly unlikely that supplementation could be considered cost-effective.
      Citation
      Kilonzon, M.M., Vale. L.D., Cook, J.A., Milne, A.C., Stephen, A.I, Avenall, A. and MAVIS Trial Group. (2007) Clinical Nutrition, 26(6)
      URI
      http://hdl.handle.net/2164/151
      DOI
      http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2006.11.002
      Collections
      • All research
      • Applied Health Sciences research

      Browse

      All of AURACommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects
      Top of Page
      • AURA Home
      • Accessibility
      • PURE
      • Digital Resources
      • Library, Special Collections & Museums
      • Take-Down Notice
      • Send Feedback
      • Contact Us
         
       
      Library, Special Collections and Museums logo
      The Sir Duncan Rice Library
      University of Aberdeen
      Bedford Road
      Aberdeen
      AB24 3AA

      Tel: +44 (0)1224 273330
      Email: library@abdn.ac.uk
       
         

      Share and keep up to date

      FacebookTwitterWordpress

      • AURA Home
      • Accessibility
      • PURE
      • Digital Resources
      • Library, Special Collections & Museums
      • Take-Down Notice
      • Send Feedback
      • Contact Us