Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZaveri, Hitten P.
dc.contributor.authorSchelter, Bjoern
dc.contributor.authorSchevon, Catherine A.
dc.contributor.authorJiruska, Premysl
dc.contributor.authorJefferys, John G. R.
dc.contributor.authorWorrell, Gregory
dc.contributor.authorSchulze-Bonhage, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorJoshi, Rasesh B.
dc.contributor.authorJirsa, Viktor
dc.contributor.authorGoodfellow, Mark
dc.contributor.authorMeisel, Christian
dc.contributor.authorLehnertz, Klaus
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-19T00:09:14Z
dc.date.available2021-03-19T00:09:14Z
dc.date.issued2020-05
dc.identifier.citationZaveri , H P , Schelter , B , Schevon , C A , Jiruska , P , Jefferys , J G R , Worrell , G , Schulze-Bonhage , A , Joshi , R B , Jirsa , V , Goodfellow , M , Meisel , C & Lehnertz , K 2020 , ' Controversies on the network theory of epilepsy : Debates held during the ICTALS 2019 conference ' , Seizure , vol. 78 , pp. 78-85 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2020.03.010en
dc.identifier.issn1059-1311
dc.identifier.otherPURE: 159744058
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 8bb77b5e-c1c5-4b17-9021-32fc14991a82
dc.identifier.otherScopus: 85082848832
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000537574100013
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2164/16077
dc.descriptionAcknowledgements We would like to acknowledge the contributions of the discussants to the exposition and discussion of the six debate topics. The discussants for debates 1-6 were Fabrice Wendling, Mark Cook, Mark Richardson, Thorsten Rings, Klaus Lehnertz and Piotr Suffczynski, respectively. Funding for ICTALS 2019 was received from the following foundations and industry partners: UCB S.A. (Belgium), American Epilepsy Society (AES), Epilepsy Innovation Institute (Ei2) and Epilepsy Foundation of America (EFA), NeuraLynx (Bozeman, MT, USA) and LivaNova (London, UK). The contribution of HZ was supported by award R01NS109062 from the National Institutes of Health, MG by the EPSRC via grants EP/P021417/1 and EP/N014391/1 and a Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Award (WT105618MA), and PJ by awards from the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic AZV 17-28427A and the Czech Science Foundation 20-25298S. The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the view of the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Health and Human Services, or the United States government.en
dc.format.extent8
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofSeizureen
dc.rights© 2020. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en
dc.subjectEpileptic networken
dc.subjectIctogenesisen
dc.subjectEpileptogenesisen
dc.subjectSeizure controlen
dc.subjectNodesen
dc.subjectEdgesen
dc.subjectPERFUSION CHANGESen
dc.subjectLONG-TERMen
dc.subjectHIGH-FREQUENCY OSCILLATIONSen
dc.subjectRECURRENT SEIZURESen
dc.subjectBRAIN MODELSen
dc.subjectEVOLUTIONen
dc.subjectSEIZURE ONSET ZONEen
dc.subjectGLUTAMINE-SYNTHETASEen
dc.subjectMETHIONINE SULFOXIMINEen
dc.subjectFOCAL EPILEPSYen
dc.subjectR Medicine (General)en
dc.subjectClinical Neurologyen
dc.subjectNeurologyen
dc.subjectEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)en
dc.subjectEP/P021417/1en
dc.subjectEP/N014391/1en
dc.subjectWellcome Trusten
dc.subjectWT105618MAen
dc.subject.lccR1en
dc.titleControversies on the network theory of epilepsy : Debates held during the ICTALS 2019 conferenceen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Aberdeen.Physicsen
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Aberdeen.Institute for Complex Systems and Mathematical Biology (ICSMB)en
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Aberdeen.Mathematical Sciences (Research Theme)en
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.description.versionPostprinten
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2020.03.010
dc.date.embargoedUntil2021-03-19
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082848832&partnerID=8YFLogxKen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record