dc.contributor.author | Treweek, Shaun | |
dc.contributor.author | Barnett, Karen | |
dc.contributor.author | Maclennan, Graeme | |
dc.contributor.author | Bonetti, Debbie | |
dc.contributor.author | Eccles, Martin P | |
dc.contributor.author | Francis, Jillian Joy | |
dc.contributor.author | Jones, Claire | |
dc.contributor.author | Pitts, Nigel B | |
dc.contributor.author | Ricketts, Ian W | |
dc.contributor.author | Weal, Mark | |
dc.contributor.author | Sullivan, Frank | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-04-25T14:26:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-04-25T14:26:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-07 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Treweek , S , Barnett , K , Maclennan , G , Bonetti , D , Eccles , M P , Francis , J J , Jones , C , Pitts , N B , Ricketts , I W , Weal , M & Sullivan , F 2012 , ' E-mail invitations to general practitioners were as effective as postal invitations and were more efficient ' , Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , vol. 65 , no. 7 , pp. 793-797 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.010 | en |
dc.identifier.other | PURE: 20012664 | |
dc.identifier.other | PURE UUID: 5051cf8c-9a8e-4907-922d-3e80ef9de7c0 | |
dc.identifier.other | PubMed: 22306007 | |
dc.identifier.other | Scopus: 84861637148 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2164/2807 | |
dc.description | Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | en |
dc.format.extent | 5 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology | en |
dc.rights | NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, [VOL 65, ISSUE 7, (2012)] DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.010 | en |
dc.subject | recruitment | en |
dc.subject | randomized controlled trials | en |
dc.subject | e-mail | en |
dc.subject | postal | en |
dc.subject | reminders | en |
dc.subject | primary care | en |
dc.subject | R Medicine | en |
dc.subject.lcc | R | en |
dc.title | E-mail invitations to general practitioners were as effective as postal invitations and were more efficient | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of Aberdeen.Other Applied Health Sciences | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of Aberdeen.Aberdeen Health Psychology Group | en |
dc.contributor.institution | University of Aberdeen.Institute of Applied Health Sciences | en |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
dc.description.version | Postprint | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.010 | |