The relative importance of information items and preferred mode of delivery when disseminating results from trials to participants : a mixed methods study
| dc.contributor.author | Wood, Jessica | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cotton, Seonaidh | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gillies, Katie | |
| dc.contributor.institution | University of Aberdeen.Aberdeen Centre for Evaluation | en |
| dc.contributor.institution | University of Aberdeen.Institute of Applied Health Sciences | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-02-16T19:48:01Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-02-16T19:48:01Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022-02-16 | |
| dc.description | ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank Suzanne Breeman, Lynda Constable and David Emele, who identified eligible participants from the VUE and PROSPECT trials; Andrea Fraser and Janice Cruden for their help preparing the mail-merge documents for the invitation packs; and Rosemary Humphreys and Sandra Jayacodi for their valuable feedback on the first drafts of the patient information leaflets and ranking exercises. This study was conducted as a Masters of Public Health research project (Jessica Wood) at the University of Aberdeen with funding provided through the School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition. Katie Gillies was supported by an Academy of Medical Sciences (SBF002\1014) award and a Medical Research Council Fellowship (MR/L01193X/1). The Health Services Research Unit is core-funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates (CZU/3/3). The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the funders. Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. Open Access via UoA Wiley Agreement Article Funding Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. | en |
| dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
| dc.format.extent | 11 | |
| dc.format.extent | 909804 | |
| dc.identifier | 193912326 | |
| dc.identifier | 306d3dda-85d7-4bb3-95b2-3c4ff3a187d0 | |
| dc.identifier | 85120668669 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Wood, J, Cotton, S & Gillies, K 2022, 'The relative importance of information items and preferred mode of delivery when disseminating results from trials to participants : a mixed methods study', Health Expectations, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 419-429. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13402 | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/hex.13402 | |
| dc.identifier.iss | 1 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1369-6513 | |
| dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0001-7890-2854/work/104792263 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2164/18074 | |
| dc.identifier.vol | 25 | en |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Health Expectations | en |
| dc.subject | clinical trials | en |
| dc.subject | dissemination | en |
| dc.subject | focus groups | en |
| dc.subject | interviews | en |
| dc.subject | mixed methods | en |
| dc.subject | participants | en |
| dc.subject | results | en |
| dc.subject | R Medicine | en |
| dc.subject | Medical Research Council (MRC) | en |
| dc.subject | MR/LO1193X/1 | en |
| dc.subject | Chief Scientist Office (CSO) | en |
| dc.subject | CZV/3/3 | en |
| dc.subject | Other | en |
| dc.subject | SBF002\1014 | en |
| dc.subject.lcc | R | en |
| dc.title | The relative importance of information items and preferred mode of delivery when disseminating results from trials to participants : a mixed methods study | en |
| dc.type | Journal article | en |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- Wood_etal_HE_the_relative_importance_VOR.pdf
- Size:
- 888.48 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
