Why Is the Equal Merit Principle (Almost) Straightforwardly Wrong?
| dc.contributor.author | Győrfi, Tamás | |
| dc.contributor.institution | University of Aberdeen.Law | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-20T00:03:24Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-11-20T00:03:24Z | |
| dc.date.embargoedUntil | 2018-11-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017-11 | |
| dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
| dc.format.extent | 20 | |
| dc.format.extent | 267953 | |
| dc.identifier | 101153551 | |
| dc.identifier | 8d9f30b6-8c07-4e2a-b964-f99e38b795a3 | |
| dc.identifier | 85034625576 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Győrfi, T 2017, 'Why Is the Equal Merit Principle (Almost) Straightforwardly Wrong?', Modern Law Review, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 1052-1072. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12302 | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/1468-2230.12302 | |
| dc.identifier.iss | 6 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0026-7961 | |
| dc.identifier.other | ORCID: /0000-0001-6639-5285/work/45185257 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2164/11471 | |
| dc.identifier.url | http://www.modernlawreview.co.uk/november-2017/equal-merit-principle-almost-straightforwardly-wrong/ | en |
| dc.identifier.vol | 80 | en |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Modern Law Review | en |
| dc.subject | SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions | en |
| dc.subject | judicial appointments | en |
| dc.subject | merit in judicial appointments | en |
| dc.subject | equal merit | en |
| dc.subject | judicial diversity | en |
| dc.subject | Constitutional Reform Act 2005 | en |
| dc.subject | Crime and Courts Act 2013 | en |
| dc.subject | K Law | en |
| dc.subject.lcc | K | en |
| dc.title | Why Is the Equal Merit Principle (Almost) Straightforwardly Wrong? | en |
| dc.type | Journal article | en |