Wilkinson, JackHeal, CalvinAntoniou, George AFlemyng, EllaAvenell, AlisonBarbour, VirginiaBordewijk, EsmeeBrown, Nicholas J LClarke, MikeDumville, Jo C.Grohmann, StephGurrin, Lyle C.Hayden, Jill AHunter, Kylie ELam, EmilyLasserson, TobyLi, TianjingLensen, Sarah FLiu, JianpingLundh, AndreasMeyerowitz-Katz, GideonMol, Ben W.O’Connell, Neil EParker, LisaRedman, BarbaraSeidler, Anna LeneSheldrick, Kyle ASydenham, EmmaDahly, Darren Lvan Wely, MadelonBero, LisaKirkham, Jamie2024-10-012024-10-012024-11Wilkinson, J, Heal, C, Antoniou, G A, Flemyng, E, Avenell, A, Barbour, V, Bordewijk, E, Brown, N J L, Clarke, M, Dumville, J C, Grohmann, S, Gurrin, L C, Hayden, J A, Hunter, K E, Lam, E, Lasserson, T, Li, T, Lensen, S F, Liu, J, Lundh, A, Meyerowitz-Katz, G, Mol, B W, O’Connell, N E, Parker, L, Redman, B, Seidler, A L, Sheldrick, K A, Sydenham, E, Dahly, D L, van Wely, M, Bero, L & Kirkham, J 2024, 'A survey of experts to identify methods to detect problematic studies : Stage 1 of the INSPECT-SR Project', Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 175, 111512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.1115120895-4356ORCID: /0000-0003-4813-5628/work/170009933https://hdl.handle.net/2164/24326The authors would like to thank Richard Stevens for helpful comments during the planning of this study10361239engResearch integrityFraudFabricationMisconductTrustworthinessRandomised controlled trialsSystematic reviewsForensic analysisEvidence synthesisCritical appraisalR MedicineNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR)NIHR203568Supplementary Datahttps://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0895435624002683-mmc1.docxRJournal article10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111512http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85204974454&partnerID=8YFLogxK175