Whale, Alexandra SHuggett, Jim FCowen, SimonSpeirs, ValerieShaw, JacquiEllison, StephenFoy, Carole AScott, Daniel J2019-04-192019-04-192012-06Whale, A S, Huggett, J F, Cowen, S, Speirs, V, Shaw, J, Ellison, S, Foy, C A & Scott, D J 2012, 'Comparison of microfluidic digital PCR and conventional quantitative PCR for measuring copy number variation', Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 40, no. 11, e82. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks2030305-1048PubMedCentral: PMC3367212ORCID: /0000-0002-0602-4666/work/72631273http://hdl.handle.net/2164/12186ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to acknowledge Dr Malcolm Burns and Dr Alison Devonshire for critical review of the manuscript9313329engSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingCell Line, TumorDNA Copy Number VariationsDNA, NeoplasmFemaleGene AmplificationGene DosageGenes, erbB-2HumansMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesPolymerase Chain ReactionComparative StudyEvaluation StudiesJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tR MedicineRJournal article10.1093/nar/gks2034011