Andrews, Nick A.Latrémolière, AlbanBasbaum, Allan I.Mogil, Jeffrey S.Porreca, FrankRice, Andrew S. C.Woolf, Clifford J.Currie, Gillian L.Dworkin, Robert H.Eisenach, James C.Evans, ScottGewandter, Jennifer S.Gover, Tony D.Handwerker, HermannHuang, WenlongIyengar, SmritiJensen, Mark P.Kennedy, Jeffrey D.Lee, NancyLevine, JonLidster, KatieMachin, IanMcDermott, Michael P.McMahon, Stephen B.Price, Theodore J.Ross, Sarah E.Scherrer, GrégorySeal, Rebecca P.Sena, Emily S.Silva, ElizabethStone, LauraSvensson, Camilla I.Turk, Dennis C.Whiteside, Garth2016-04-042016-04-042016-04Andrews, N A, Latrémolière, A, Basbaum, A I, Mogil, J S, Porreca, F, Rice, A S C, Woolf, C J, Currie, G L, Dworkin, R H, Eisenach, J C, Evans, S, Gewandter, J S, Gover, T D, Handwerker, H, Huang, W, Iyengar, S, Jensen, M P, Kennedy, J D, Lee, N, Levine, J, Lidster, K, Machin, I, McDermott, M P, McMahon, S B, Price, T J, Ross, S E, Scherrer, G, Seal, R P, Sena, E S, Silva, E, Stone, L, Svensson, C I, Turk, D C & Whiteside, G 2016, 'Ensuring transparency and minimization of methodologic bias in preclinical pain research : PPRECISE considerations', Pain, vol. 157, no. 4, pp. 901-909. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.00000000000004580304-3959http://hdl.handle.net/2164/5816Acknowledgements The authors thank Allison Lin, Dan Mellon, and LiSheng Chen for their help throughout the process of writing this article.9502399engtransparent reportingconsensusbiasinternal validityR MedicineRJournal article10.1097/j.pain.00000000000004581574