Hagen, SuzanneMcClurg, DoreenBugge, CarolHay-Smith, JeanDean, Sarah GerardElders, AndrewGlazener, CathrynAbdel-Fattah, MohamedAgur, Wael IbrahimBooth, JoGuerrero, KarenNorrie, JohnKilonzo, MaryMcPherson, GladysMcDonald, AlisonStratton, SusanSergenson, NicoleGrant, AileenWilson, Lyndsay2019-04-042019-04-042019-04Hagen, S, McClurg, D, Bugge, C, Hay-Smith, J, Dean, S G, Elders, A, Glazener, C, Abdel-Fattah, M, Agur, W I, Booth, J, Guerrero, K, Norrie, J, Kilonzo, M, McPherson, G, McDonald, A, Stratton, S, Sergenson, N, Grant, A & Wilson, L 2019, 'Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of basic versus biofeedback-mediated intensive pelvic floor muscle training for female stress or mixed urinary incontinence : protocol for the OPAL randomised trial', BMJ Open, vol. 9, no. 2, e024153. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-0241532044-6055Mendeley: 9e67adc8-ccb9-3a77-9cbe-8033b6475316ORCID: /0000-0002-3450-4536/work/170010848http://hdl.handle.net/2164/12129Funding This work is supported by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme (project reference: 11/71/03). Acknowledgments: The authors also acknowledge the support of the National Institute for Health Research, through the Comprehensive Clinical Research Network. SD’s position is partly supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South West Peninsula at the Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust.1226320engSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingadherencebiofeedbackelectromyographylong-termpelvic floor muscle trainingurinary incontinenceR MedicineNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR)11/71/03RJournal article10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024153http://www.mendeley.com/research/effectiveness-costeffectiveness-basic-versus-biofeedbackmediated-intensive-pelvic-floor-muscle-train-192