Krucien, NicolasWatson, VerityRyan, Mandy2019-08-262019-08-262017-12Krucien, N, Watson, V & Ryan, M 2017, 'Is best-worst scaling suitable for health state valuation? A comparison with discrete choice experiments', Health Economics, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. e1-e16. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.34591057-9230http://hdl.handle.net/2164/12784The University of Aberdeen (UoA) and the Chief Scientist Office (CSO) of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates fund the Health Economics Research Unit (HERU). We thank all participants who took part in the study and the WH Ross foundation that supported the data collection. We also thank authors of the original study (Mary Kilonzo, Jennifer Burr and Luke Vale) for their contribution to questionnaire design and data collection. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors only and not those of the funding bodies.16861942engBest-worst scalingDiscrete choice experimentsHealth utilityStated preferencesR MedicineChief Scientist Office (CSO)Supplementary DataRIs best-worst scaling suitable for health state valuation? : A comparison with discrete choice experimentsJournal article10.1002/hec.34592612