Utz, Kathrin SHesse, ConstanzeHintz, AnnikaGrüneberger, DanielaKulke, HartwigRoth, IngaKlos, ThomasKromichal, VaclavMelms, ArthurSchupp, WilfriedKhol, DetlefSchenk, Thomas2018-05-252018-05-252018-01Utz, K S, Hesse, C, Hintz, A, Grüneberger, D, Kulke, H, Roth, I, Klos, T, Kromichal, V, Melms, A, Schupp, W, Khol, D & Schenk, T 2018, 'Visual feedback explains why propointing is better than antipointing in spatial neglect', Cortex, vol. 98, pp. 114-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.05.0120010-9452http://hdl.handle.net/2164/10492Kathrin S. Utz held a post-doctoral research fellowship of the Friedrich-AlexanderUniversity Erlangen-Nuremberg (program for the promotion of equal opportunities of women in science) at the time of data collection. Thomas Schenk was supported by grants from the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG, grant no’s: DFG-SCHE 735/2-1 and DFG-SCHE 735/3-1).14806117engvisuomotor controlallocentricegocentricpointingantipointingBF PsychologyBFVisual feedback explains why propointing is better than antipointing in spatial neglectJournal article10.1016/j.cortex.2017.05.01298