Albanito, FabrizioHastings, AstleyFitton, NualaRichards, MarkMartin, MikeMac Dowell, NiallBell, DaveTaylor, Simon C.Butnar, IsabellaLi, Pei‐HaoSlade, RaphaelSmith, Pete2019-09-272019-09-272019-10Albanito, F, Hastings, A, Fitton, N, Richards, M, Martin, M, Mac Dowell, N, Bell, D, Taylor, S C, Butnar, I, Li, PH, Slade, R & Smith, P 2019, 'Mitigation potential and environmental impact of centralized versus distributed BECCS with domestic biomass production in Great Britain', Global Change Biology. Bioenergy, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1234-1252. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.126301757-1693Mendeley: 9972d1e3-20e3-3038-a98f-9291f8b697d9ORCID: /0000-0002-2655-5982/work/60327720ORCID: /0000-0001-9863-7613/work/94084216ORCID: /0000-0002-3784-1124/work/162728125http://hdl.handle.net/2164/13006ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was carried out under the UK Energy Research Council (UKERC)‐funded project ‘Assessing potential, feasibility and impacts of Bioenergy with CCS (BECCS) in the UK (Access‐BECCS)’. We thank Dr Ajay Gambhir for valuable comments and discussion.191828437engSDG 7 - Affordable and Clean EnergySDG 13 - Climate ActionSDG 15 - Life on Landagricultural GHG emissionsBECCSbioenergy cropscarbon capture and storageclimate mitigation strategyfuture energy scenariosgreenhouse gasesland-use changeGREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONSLAND-USE CHANGEBIOENERGY CROPSLIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASSENERGY CROPSMISCANTHUSBIOFUELCARBONMODELAVAILABILITYQH301 BiologyForestryWaste Management and DisposalAgronomy and Crop ScienceRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the EnvironmentUK Research and Innovation (UKRI)QH301Journal article10.1111/gcbb.12630http://www.mendeley.com/research/mitigation-potential-environmental-impact-centralized-versus-distributed-beccs-domestic-biomass-prodhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072996472&partnerID=8YFLogxK1110