Boyers, DwayneKilonzo, MaryDavidson, TraceyCooper, DavidWardle, JudithBhal, KironN’Dow, JamesMacLennan, GraemeNorrie, JohnAbdel-Fattah, Mohamed2023-08-302023-08-302023-08-29Boyers, D, Kilonzo, M, Davidson, T, Cooper, D, Wardle, J, Bhal, K, N’Dow, J, MacLennan, G, Norrie, J & Abdel-Fattah, M 2023, 'Patient preferences for stress urinary incontinence treatments : a discrete choice experiment ', BMJ Open, vol. 13, no. 8, e066157, pp. e066157. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-0661572044-6055ORCID: /0000-0002-1039-5646/work/141720059ORCID: /0000-0002-3450-4536/work/170010822https://hdl.handle.net/2164/21581Funding: The study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment Programme (project number: 12/127/157). The full project report is available from the funder’s website: https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hta/BTSA6148%23/abstract. The full citation for the funder report is: Abdel-Fattah M, Cooper D, Davidson T, Kilonzo M, Boyers D, Bhal K, et al. Single-incision mini-slings versus standard synthetic mid-urethral slings for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: The SIMS RCT. Health Technol Assess 2022;26(47). The Health Economics Research Unit and Health Services Research Unit are both funded by the Chief Scientist’s Office (CSO) of the Scottish government health directorates. The SIMS trial was registered as: ISRCTN93264234.272588233engSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingSurgeryUrinary IncontinenceHealth policyHealth EconomicsPatient preferenceR MedicineChief Scientist Office (CSO)Supplementary DataRJournal article10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066157138