Sapkota, Tek B.Vetter, Sylvia HJat, M LSirohi, SmitaShirsath, Paresh BSingh, RajbirJat, Hanuman SSmith, PeteHillier, JonStirling, Clare M.2018-11-292018-11-292019-03-10Sapkota, T B, Vetter, S H, Jat, M L, Sirohi, S, Shirsath, P B, Singh, R, Jat, H S, Smith, P, Hillier, J & Stirling, C M 2019, 'Cost-effective opportunities for climate change mitigation in Indian agriculture', Science of the Total Environment, vol. 655, pp. 1342-1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173853, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.2250048-9697Mendeley: 103dc9e0-866e-3bfb-aa64-4c8b28879c68ORCID: /0000-0001-5241-2435/work/91891892ORCID: /0000-0002-3784-1124/work/162728593http://hdl.handle.net/2164/11533This work was jointly carried out by International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) and University of Aberdeen and funded by the CGIAR research program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS). CCAFS’ work is supported by CGIAR Fund Donors and through bilateral funding agreements. For details please visit https://ccafs.cgiar.org/donors. The views expressed in this paper cannot be taken to reflect the official opinions of these organizations. We sincerely acknowledge the input and support provided by various stakeholders in India during stakeholder meetings. We are thankful to Gokul Prasad for graphics assistance. Corrigendum to “Cost-effective opportunities for climate change mitigation in Indian agriculture” [Sci. Total Environ. 655 (2019) 1342–1354, (S0048969718345819), (10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.225)] Tek B. Sapkota, Sylvia H. Vetter, M. L. Jat, Smita Sirohi, Paresh B. Shirsath, Rajbir Singh, Hanuman S. Jat, Pete Smith, Jon Hillier, Clare M. Stirling, 2024, vol. 942. Science of the Total Environment http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85195836846&partnerID=8YFLogxK. DOI. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173853 The authors regret that the published version of the above article contained an error in Fig. 3 and their description in the fourth paragraph of the section “3.1 Total GHG emissions”. The error was because the sugarcane and cotton panels in Fig. 3 was swapped. The correct and final version Fig. 3 and associated description follows. All other sections of the manuscript or conclusion thereof remains the same.134041574engSDG 2 - Zero HungerSDG 13 - Climate Actiongreenhouse gasagricultureclimate changemitigationmarginal abatement cost curvesIndiaMitigationClimate changeMarginal Abatement Cost CurveGreenhouse gasAgricultureSYSTEMFIELDSGREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONSTILLAGENITROGENSOIL CARBON SEQUESTRATIONMETHANE EMISSIONIMPACTSQH301 BiologyPollutionWaste Management and DisposalEnvironmental EngineeringEnvironmental ChemistryQH301Journal article10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173853http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057300469&partnerID=8YFLogxKhttp://www.mendeley.com/research/costeffective-opportunities-climate-change-mitigation-indian-agriculture-1https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969724040002?via%3Dihubhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85195836846&partnerID=8YFLogxK655