Lilley, RossChan, EvangelineNg, NicklausOrr, AmberSzostok, MarcinYeh, Gloria Ting TingTulloch, RossRamsay, GeorgeMokini, ZhirajrForget, Patrice2021-10-072021-10-072021-09Lilley, R, Chan, E, Ng, N, Orr, A, Szostok, M, Yeh, G T T, Tulloch, R, Ramsay, G, Mokini, Z & Forget, P 2021, 'Recurrence kinetics after laparoscopic versus open surgery in colon cancer. A meta-analysis', Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 10, no. 18, 4163. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm101841632077-0383ORCID: /0000-0001-5772-8439/work/101394939https://hdl.handle.net/2164/17286Funding Information: No paper reported any conflicts of interest. Seven reported no external funding. The COST trial received a number of grants from the National Cancer Institute [15] and the COLOR trial received funding from Ethicon Endo‐surgery and the Swedish Cancer Foundation [19]. Neither corporation influenced initiation, design or any other aspect of the study. Funding Information: 4 Independent Researcher, supported by the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Mentorship Programme, B‐1000 Brussels, Belgium; zhirajrmokini@yahoo.com141274134engSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingColon cancerLaparoscopic surgeryMeta-analysisOpen surgeryRecurrence kineticsR Medicine (General)General MedicineSupplementary InformationR1Recurrence kinetics after laparoscopic versus open surgery in colon cancer. A meta-analysisJournal item10.3390/jcm101841631018