Robertson, CArcot Ragupathy, S KBoachie, CDixon, J MFraser, CHernández, RHeys, SJack, WKerr, G RLawrence, GMacLennan, GMaxwell, AMcGregor, JMowatt, GPinder, STernent, LThomas, R EVale, LWilson, RZhu, SGilbert, F J2012-03-232012-03-232011-08Robertson, C, Arcot Ragupathy, S K, Boachie, C, Dixon, J M, Fraser, C, Hernández, R, Heys, S, Jack, W, Kerr, G R, Lawrence, G, MacLennan, G, Maxwell, A, McGregor, J, Mowatt, G, Pinder, S, Ternent, L, Thomas, R E, Vale, L, Wilson, R, Zhu, S & Gilbert, F J 2011, 'The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different surveillance mammography regimens after the treatment for primary breast cancer : systematic reviews registry database analyses and economic evaluation', Health Technology Assessment, vol. 15, no. 34, pp. v-vi, 1-322. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta153402046-4924ORCID: /0000-0002-1039-5646/work/98038560ORCID: /0000-0003-2619-8230/work/159078530ORCID: /0000-0002-8316-2616/work/161798374http://hdl.handle.net/2164/2319Final Report Submitted to NIHR HTA Programme3224645808engSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingAdultBreast NeoplasmsCost-Benefit AnalysisDatabases, FactualFemaleGreat BritainHealth Care SurveysHumansIncidenceMagnetic Resonance ImagingMammographyMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrevalenceQuality-Adjusted Life YearsRegistriesRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificitySurvival AnalysisUltrasonographyRC Internal medicineRCJournal article10.3310/hta15340http://www.hta.ac.uk/1709http://www.abdn.ac.uk/hsru/research/delivery/users/mammography-regimes/1534