Nagy, TamásHergert, JaneElsheriff, MahmoudWallrich, LukasSchmidt, KathleenWaltzer, TalPayne, JasonGjoneska, BiljanaSeetahul, YashvinWang, Y. AndreScharfenberg, DanielTyson, GabriellaYang, Yu FangSkvortsova, AleksandrinaAlarie, SamuelGraves, KatherineSotola, LukasMoreau, DavidRubínová, Eva2025-09-152025-07Nagy, T, Hergert, J, Elsheriff, M, Wallrich, L, Schmidt, K, Waltzer, T, Payne, J, Gjoneska, B, Seetahul, Y, Wang, Y A, Scharfenberg, D, Tyson, G, Yang, Y F, Skvortsova, A, Alarie, S, Graves, K, Sotola, L, Moreau, D & Rubínová, E 2025, 'Bestiary of Questionable Research Practices in Psychology', Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1-36. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/fhk98_v2, https://doi.org/10.1177/251524592513484312515-2459ORCID: /0000-0001-9790-6180/work/190041665https://hdl.handle.net/2164/26012The authors express their gratitude to the experts who participated in the "QRP Bestiary: Creating an Inventory and Taxonomy of Questionable Research Practices" hackathon at the SIPS 2022 meeting, which marked the inception of this project.36719523engcredibility crisisexpert consensusMetascienceopen scienceQPRresearch integrityresearch methodsBF PsychologyQ Science (General)Supplementary DataDASBFQ1Journal article10.31234/osf.io/fhk98_v283